Washington state's approach to worker policy is creating unintended consequences that may be limiting employment opportunities, according to a new analysis published June 22, 2026 by the Washington Policy Center. The report argues that policies designed to protect workers are actually reducing their options by driving employers out of state. The analysis contends that being business-friendly and worker-friendly aren't competing goals — they're the same thing.

The report cites a recent survey by the Association of Washington Business showing nearly one in four employers surveyed is looking to move business out of state. According to the Washington Policy Center, problematic policies for workers include barriers to entry-level work and independent contractors, union favors that come at workers' expense, and unusually high payroll taxes that decrease take-home wages. Workers in Washington also face high housing costs, high fuel and grocery prices, and high sales taxes. The report points to programs like Paid Family and Medical Leave and the WA Cares Fund as "paycheck penalties" that require workers — including low-income workers — to give up money needed for rent, transportation, food, and education to fund benefits they may never use.

The report raises a fundamental policy question: who benefits from a policy, and who pays for it? The authors write that "a policy is not worker-friendly simply because supporters describe it that way" and that lawmakers should be asking what happens in the real world. The analysis states that minimum wage policy creates a contradiction where some workers receive higher hourly pay, but workers at the margins — especially young, inexperienced, or lower-skilled workers — can lose hours, job opportunities, or the first rung on the ladder altogether. The report concludes that "workers do not gain power when opportunity shrinks" and that "the strongest protection a worker has is the ability to walk away from a job to something better."

The Washington Policy Center explains that restrictive gig-worker regulations, barriers for independent contractors, excessive occupational licensing, and labor rules that increase the cost and complexity of creating work can make jobs less available even when sold as pro-worker policies. The report argues that work is too often discussed as exploitation and business owners are treated as villains, calling this framing "deeply unhealthy" when most work is actually a voluntary exchange that benefits both sides. The analysis warns that if Washington continues raising costs, adding mandates, and sending hostile signals to employers, it will make it harder for businesses to grow and harder for workers to build their future in the state.

The report's bottom line is straightforward: more employers mean more options, and more options mean more worker power. While Washington remains home to extraordinary workers, entrepreneurs, and innovative companies, the authors caution against confusing past success with future competitiveness in an increasingly costly regulatory environment.