Missouri quietly pulled a state contract from Public Partnerships LLC (PPL) in March 2026 after discovering the New York-based company made false claims in its winning proposal, according to a MacIver Institute report published June 23, 2026. The revelation adds another red flag to Wisconsin's controversial decision to award PPL a contract to serve as the sole fiscal agent for the state's IRIS Medicaid program, which serves about 30,000 older adults and individuals with disabilities with a $1.4 billion annual budget. The Missouri contract revocation came just months before the U.S. Department of Justice filed suit against PPL last week, alleging bid rigging in New York.

In a letter announcing the contract revocation, Stacia Dawson of the Missouri Department of Mental Health pointed to language in PPL's proposal claiming the company "had never experienced a delay in transitioning award programs," the report states. That claim contradicted PPL's well-publicized delays in serving programs in New York and Pennsylvania. Wisconsin's Department of Health Services awarded its IRIS contract to PPL earlier this year despite the company's track record of problems running similar programs in other states. The IRIS program allows enrollees to direct their own long-term care and often hire loved ones using Medicaid funds to provide care.

The Missouri case mirrors problems that have surfaced around PPL's operations in multiple states. The report notes that last week, the U.S. Department of Justice filed suit against PPL and senior members of New York Governor Kathy Hochul's administration alleging a "sham bid process." Similar to Missouri's concerns, the federal suit alleges that PPL submitted an "artificially attractive proposal" to secure the New York contract. The MacIver Institute has been reporting on Wisconsin's PPL contract since January, highlighting the company's ties to the Service Employees International Union, operational problems in other states, and allegations of bid rigging surrounding New York's contract.

The pattern of contract issues raises questions about Wisconsin's vendor selection process at a critical time. Patients and advocates have voiced concerns for months over the decision to consolidate all payroll operations for IRIS under one company, particularly given PPL's troubled history. Missouri's decision to revoke its contract after discovering false claims in PPL's proposal suggests the company may have used similar tactics to win multiple state contracts. The report concludes that these developments "should prompt calls to re-open the bidding process to ensure Wisconsin taxpayers and patients are well-served by the selection of such an important vendor." With federal prosecutors now investigating PPL's New York contract and Missouri pulling its own deal over misrepresentations, Wisconsin faces mounting pressure to reconsider a contract that affects 30,000 vulnerable residents and $1.4 billion in annual Medicaid spending.